Will Tuladhar-Douglas<p>Apropos of discussion around reintroductions into the Highlands of <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/Scotland" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Scotland</span></a>, here is a very good study by Ouvrier, Vimal et al on the interactions between <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/bears" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bears</span></a>, <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/sheep" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sheep</span></a>, <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/dogs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>dogs</span></a>, <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/government" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>government</span></a>, and <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/shepherds" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>shepherds</span></a> in the French Pyrenees. It uses a more-than-human geography approach to argue that a patchy, localised analysis has to be the foundation of more comprehensive analysis. <a href="https://todon.nl/tags/Mountains" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Mountains</span></a> are inherently patchy sites of analysis!</p><p><a href="https://besjournals.pericles-prod.literatumonline.com/doi/full/10.1002/pan3.70000" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">besjournals.pericles-prod.lite</span><span class="invisible">ratumonline.com/doi/full/10.1002/pan3.70000</span></a></p>