"You do you" is Eu-gen-ics.<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://disabled.social/@antiableistdreams" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>antiableistdreams</span></a></span> </p><p>Circling <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@impactology" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>impactology</span></a></span> into this discussion.</p><p>Would imagine that any cripistemology would be in contraposition to ideals of justification, reliability, validity. That, indeed, such contrapositionality would be axiomatic ground.</p><p>Indeed, is death of just such Platonic eternals that one must mourn to even open a space for <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/criptheory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>criptheory</span></a>.</p><p>As for Latour, hoboy!, don't get me started on my critique of WHNBM, from his inverted pre-trans fallacy to his vernacular misreading of Hobbes.</p>