MastodonTech.de

Thor A. HoplandLet's just face facts, folks.<a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/KDE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#KDE</a> Discover is faster than <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/GNOME" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#GNOME</a> software, but <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/COSMIC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#COSMIC</a> Store has them beat - and partly to blame is <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/PackageKit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PackageKit</a>.There's a point where "seperation of concerns" goes awry, and this abstraction of package managers is imho one such example.This is ofc a <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/UX" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#UX</a> issue. If we compare with say <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/AppStore" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AppStore</a> or <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/PlayStore" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PlayStore</a> or <a href="https://snabelen.no/tags/MicrosoftStore" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MicrosoftStore</a> even, we can sort of feel our way to how each are sluggish in their own way.But some of those GNOME Software loading times? Goddamn.

Patrick Wu :neocat_flag_bi:I am today years old to know that GNOME software is powered by PackageKit that is run in a way that even bypass local PackageKit configuration...<a href="https://o0o.social/tags/gnome" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#gnome</a> <a href="https://o0o.social/tags/packagekit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#packagekit</a> <a href="https://o0o.social/tags/dnf" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#dnf</a> <a href="https://o0o.social/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#linux</a>

Matthias KlumppI am very honored to be part of the first Sovereign Tech Fellowship program! This will directly support my work on <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FreeDesktop" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#FreeDesktop</a>, <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/AppStream" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#AppStream</a> and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PackageKit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PackageKit</a>, so expect a lot more changes faster, and also way faster patch reviews. This is also the first time ever that I have dedicated time to work on fd.o, and I am excited about the possibilities! You can expect blog posts about it in future 😄 You can read more about the amazing program and the other fellows here: <a href="https://www.sovereign.tech/news/meet-the-sovereign-tech-fellows" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.sovereign.tech/news/meet-the-sovereign-tech-fellows</a>

FlakyThis is something Linux kinda gets right. One-click install and done, especially with Flatpak. Though, apparently PackageKit, which is meant to abstract the package manager stuff, is dead. Anyone in the know, do you know what's replacing it? Curious.<a href="https://furry.engineer/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://furry.engineer/tags/PackageKit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PackageKit</a>

AliveDevil<a href="https://tauri.earth/tags/PackageKit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PackageKit</a> works wonderfully.<a href="https://gist.github.com/AliveDevil/646a63b88fedca0ebfdf2b82ef0fab34" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://gist.github.com/AliveDevil/646a63b88fedca0ebfdf2b82ef0fab34</a>Just hangs there and doesn't show anything. With --backends packagekit this works, with --backends flatpak this hangs.<a href="https://tauri.earth/tags/Fedora" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Fedora</a> <a href="https://tauri.earth/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://tauri.earth/tags/Flatpak" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Flatpak</a>

Matthias KlumppI'm glad Mint seems to have moved off the plans to revive aptdaemon - that code has been on life support for a loooong time and is basically unmaintainable today (Ubuntu knows this and ports away from it, but phasing it out completely takes a while). I'd definitely welcome contributions to <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PackageKit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PackageKit</a> and its APT backend from Mint, which is actually actively used by new projects 😉 (and for dead certain could use and would welcome new contributions!) <a href="https://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=4749" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://blog.linuxmint.com/?p=4749</a>

Martin SchmittCW systemd packagekit

Frühere Suchanfragen

Suchoptionen

Verwaltet von:

Serverstatistik:

#packagekit