MastodonTech.de

FlaTechnical question, what's the best way to read/write an <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> drive from <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/windows11" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#windows11</a> ? I tried <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WSL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#WSL</a> but the read performance is so bad it is not usable. I found several softs online but no idea which one is trustable so if anyone has feedback to share, that would be appreciated. RT welcome

Wordmark<a href="https://social.lansky.name/@hn50" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@hn50</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> speedups of up to 37% for sequential I/O workloads <a href="https://mas.to/tags/wow" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#wow</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/holycrap" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#holycrap</a>

Diego Córdoba 🇦🇷Liberado el kernel <a href="https://mstdn.io/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#linux</a> 6.16! 👏 👏 Por lo poco que vi parece que hay varias mejoras en rendimiento y seguridad!* Se mejora de rendimiento en <a href="https://mstdn.io/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> (entre otros fs) * Se mejora el soporte para <a href="https://mstdn.io/tags/rust" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#rust</a> en más subsistemas * Mejora la optimización de CPU al momento de compilar el kernel en <a href="https://mstdn.io/tags/x86" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#x86</a> * Se incorpora el zero-copy en <a href="https://mstdn.io/tags/TCP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TCP</a>Cositas interesantes en el mundo <a href="https://mstdn.io/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#linux</a> ! <a href="https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_6.16" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_6.16</a>

AskUbuntuHow to recover an overwritten EXT4 Partition table deleted during restoring image with Clonezilla <a href="https://ubuntu.social/tags/partitioning" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#partitioning</a> <a href="https://ubuntu.social/tags/datarecovery" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#datarecovery</a> <a href="https://ubuntu.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://ubuntu.social/tags/testdisk" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#testdisk</a> <a href="https://ubuntu.social/tags/clonezilla" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#clonezilla</a><a href="https://askubuntu.com/q/1553222/612" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://askubuntu.com/q/1553222/612</a>

tundaIch nutze seit kurzem <a href="https://layer8.space/tags/btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#btrfs</a> im täglichen gebrauch und hab keine einschränkungen bisher erlebt. alles fein. vorher <a href="https://layer8.space/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a>

Crazy-to-Bike<a href="https://troet.cafe/@Klimakipppunkt" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@Klimakipppunkt@troet.cafe</a> <a href="https://freiburg.social/@CrazyIT" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@CrazyIT@freiburg.social</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@alexantemachina" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@alexantemachina@mastodon.social</a> Um Backups auf ein <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Samba" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Samba</a> oder <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/NFS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NFS</a> <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Share" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Share</a> auszulagern, braucht es gar kein Addon. Das geht otb mit Bordmitteln. Ich würde gern, nach der Erfahrung, dass die komplette Konfiguration sowie <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Datenbank" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Datenbank</a> weg waren (komplett leerer Ordner /homeassistant) gerne diese auf ein vernünftiges <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Dateisystem" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Dateisystem</a> wie <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/ext4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> oder <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/ZFS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ZFS</a> auslagern. <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/exFat" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#exFat</a> ist, basierend auf <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Fat32" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Fat32</a> einfach <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/FailByDesign" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#FailByDesign</a> und nicht zeitgemäß. Ich wiederhole mich hier: Wie man auf die Schnapsidee kommen kann, ein <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Linux" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> basiertes System mit einem exFat Dateisystem auszuliefern, ist einfach komplett unverständlich und 🤡🤡🤡 <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/Homeassistant" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Homeassistant</a> <a href="https://fediworld.de/tags/HA" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#HA</a>

★Pope Miller the DefondorIch wollte heute eine alte 500GB Festplatte als Musikspeicher für möglichst alle <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/Betriebssysteme" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Betriebssysteme</a> formatieren. Stellt sich mal wieder raus: <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/FAT32" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#FAT32</a> und <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/NTFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NTFS</a> sind immer noch ungeeignet. Jede Menge "Sonderzeichen", wie z.B. "?" im Dateinamen werfen Fehler und die Dateien werden nicht gespeichert. Tjo nun, dann nehm ich eben wieder <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/Ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Ext4</a>. <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> kommt damit klar, <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/MacOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MacOS</a> glaube ich auch. Wenn ich die Platte mal an einem <a href="https://ruhr.social/tags/Windows" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Windows</a> anschließe und sie nicht gelesen werden kann - Pech gehabt.

Patrick Wu :neocat_flag_bi:One Open-source Project Daily Ext4 file system driver for Windows <a href="https://github.com/bobranten/Ext4Fsd" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://github.com/bobranten/Ext4Fsd</a> <a href="https://hatoya.cafe/tags/1ospd" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#1ospd</a> <a href="https://hatoya.cafe/tags/ext4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://hatoya.cafe/tags/windows" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#windows</a> <a href="https://hatoya.cafe/tags/fs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#fs</a>

GeeklandExt4 vs Btrfs: ¿Cuál sistema de archivos elegir? <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/software_y_hardware" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#software_y_hardware</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#btrfs</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ext4_vs_btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4_vs_btrfs</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/filesystem_linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#filesystem_linux</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/integridad_de_datos" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#integridad_de_datos</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rendimiento_disco" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#rendimiento_disco</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sistema_de_archivos_linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#sistema_de_archivos_linux</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/snapshot" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#snapshot</a> <a href="https://notilinux.com/ext4-vs-btrfs/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://notilinux.com/ext4-vs-btrfs/</a>

Atomozero📊 New <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/Haiku" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Haiku</a> development report - May 2025!A month focused on targeted improvements and stability: - HaikuDepot now more user-friendly for newcomers - Important Tracker and Terminal fixes - Major BUrl class rework with cleaner API - More stable <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/NFSv4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NFSv4</a> and <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> drivers - <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/Wacom" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Wacom</a> <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/Intuos4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Intuos4</a> support addedInteresting milestone: 258 HaikuPorts commits vs 52 core system - shows growing maturity! 🚀Full report: <a href="https://www.desktoponfire.com/haikuos/software/778/haiku-overview-of-may-2025-developments/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.desktoponfire.com/haikuos/software/778/haiku-overview-of-may-2025-developments/</a><a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenSource</a> <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/BeOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BeOS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/HaikuOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#HaikuOS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.uno/tags/SoftwareDevelopment" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SoftwareDevelopment</a>

Andreas ScherbaumResize ext4 root filesystem on the fly<a href="https://andreas.scherbaum.la/post/2025-06-12_resize-ext4-root-filesystem-on-the-fly/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://andreas.scherbaum.la/post/2025-06-12_resize-ext4-root-filesystem-on-the-fly/</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/fdisk" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#fdisk</a>

Dendrobatus AzureusWhat do you do when NTFS fails you?Reinstall then restore. Here the installation is on the metal of course just win10 running isolated & air gapped <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Journal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Journal</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/filesystem" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#filesystem</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenSource</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/NTFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NTFS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/ClosedSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClosedSource</a>

Dendrobatus AzureusToday I learned the following. Journaling and journaling are two separate distinctly separate manners of keeping file systems in Sync.When microsoft talks about journaling in NTFS you should never, ever think about the robust journaling system that Ext4 hasIn comparison EXT4 journaling is a god while en NTFS journaling is not even an antI have EXT4 file systems connected to an extremely unstable machine. This thing crashes to green screens more than 64 times a day.{It's a Gigabyte Mini PC in case you're interested never buy those. The machine came with overheating errors from the beginning. The factory installed a fan for the APU which is not even suitable for a GPU that was made a decade ago}I've not even lost one bit of data on those EXT4 file systems.Those NTFS file systems with journaling? I lost all of them. All NTFS file systems were lostI didn't lose data because I have backups the file systems just keeled over simply because the machine kept rebooting Thank you for being so robust EXT4 <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/Journal" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Journal</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/filesystem" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#filesystem</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenSource</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/NTFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NTFS</a> <a href="https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/tags/ClosedSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ClosedSource</a>

AptiviYour EXT4 filesystem will be speedier on Linux 6.16!<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Kernel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Kernel</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LinuxKernel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LinuxKernel</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Computers" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Computers</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Laptops" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Laptops</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TechNews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TechNews</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TechUpdates" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TechUpdates</a><a href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/2025/05/28/linux-6-16-yields-improved-ext4-performance/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/2025/05/28/linux-6-16-yields-improved-ext4-performance/</a>

AptiviLinux 6.16 yields improved EXT4 performance!As part of the changes that are done in Linux 6.16, there are some of the very interesting changes that are done to the EXT4 filesystem. Those changes yield improved performance, causing you to have a faster EXT4 filesystem compared to the recently released Linux 6.15.Those changes have been made to improve the filesystem performance, which will be pushed to the v6.16 development branch from <a href="https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250527200206.GA2433735@mit.edu/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">this PR</a>, including:<ul><li>Fast commit performance improvements</li><li>Multi-fsblock atomic write support for bigalloc file systems</li><li>Large folio support for regular files</li></ul>The large folio support for regular files was, in itself, a factor of the improvements, along with all other changes, which yielded over 37% performance increase according to the kernel test robot that made <a href="https://lore.kernel.org/all/202505161418.ec0d753f-lkp@intel.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">this report you can see here</a>. According to the test robot, it has reported that it had noticed a 37.7% improvement on <code>fsmark.files_per_sec</code>.The large folio support for regular files has been added with <a href="https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250512063319.3539411-9-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">this patch</a>, which checks for the following conditions in the <code>ext4_should_enable_large_folio()</code> function before enabling such support:<ul><li>If <code>i_mode</code> on an inode is a regular file using the <code><a href="https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/inode.7.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">S_ISREG()</a></code> macro</li><li>If either the data flags on the superblock or the inode flags has the journal data flags</li><li>If the superblock has no verity and has no encryption support</li></ul>Also, Linux 6.16 fixes some corruption bugs on an EXT4 file system caused by race conditions in the extent status tree. Those race conditions were potentially manifested from the heavy simultaneous allocation and deallocation to a single file.Expect the first release candidate of Linux 6.16 in the next two weeks!<a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/ext4/" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/filesystem/" target="_blank">#Filesystem</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/linux/" target="_blank">#Linux</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/linux-6-16/" target="_blank">#Linux616</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/linux-kernel/" target="_blank">#LinuxKernel</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/news/" target="_blank">#news</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/tech/" target="_blank">#Tech</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/technology/" target="_blank">#Technology</a> <a rel="nofollow noopener" class="hashtag u-tag u-category" href="https://officialaptivi.wordpress.com/tag/update/" target="_blank">#update</a>

ricardo :mastodon:<a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/EXT4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EXT4</a> For <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Linux</a> 6.16 Brings A Change Yielding "Really Stupendous Performance" <a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.16-EXT4-Performance" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.16-EXT4-Performance</a>

MikaI've managed to get <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/OpenMediaVault" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenMediaVault</a> working on my <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/RaspberryPi" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RaspberryPi</a> (running <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Raspbian" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Raspbian</a> Lite) and the performance seems pretty impressive! Despite relying on USB storage for the SSDs. This is my first time running a <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/NAS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#NAS</a> on the Pi, on <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/OMV" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OMV</a>, not using <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/ZFS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ZFS</a> or <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/RAID" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RAID</a> but rather an <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Unraid" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Unraid</a> like solution, 'cept, <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/FOSS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#FOSS</a> called <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/SnapRAID" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SnapRAID</a> in combination with <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/mergerfs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#mergerfs</a> (the drives themselves are simply <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/EXT4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#EXT4</a>). So far, honestly, so good. I got 2x 1TB SSDs for data, and another 1TB SSD for parity. Don't have a backup for the data themselves atm, but I do have a scheduled backup solution (<a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/RaspiBackup" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RaspiBackup</a>) setup for the OS itself (SD card). It's also got <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Timeshift" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Timeshift</a> for creating daily snapshots. I'm not out of the woods yet though, cos after this comes the (somewhat) scary part, deploying <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Immich" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Immich</a> on the Pi lol. I really could just deploy it in my <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/Proxmox" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Proxmox</a> <a href="https://sakurajima.social/tags/homelab" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#homelab</a>, and I wouldn't have to worry about system resources or hardware transcoding, etc. but I really wanna experiment this 'everything hosted/contained in 1 Pi' concept.

r1w1s1Here still using <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> on my laptop but for sensitive info I use password-store I try to keep simple as possible but luks is ok, very mature and widely use.

Scott Williams 🐧A bunch more manual xfs repairs over the past week. In contrast, there's been exactly zero ext4 or btrfs manual fsck's needed for the same environments. All with some flavor of EL8 or EL9 on two different storage platforms (Ceph, Longhorn). Still no idea what's causing it, but xfs continues to be the outlier. <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/xfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#xfs</a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/btrfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#btrfs</a> <a href="https://mastodon.online/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a>

Droppie [infosec] 🐨:archlinux: :kde: :firefox_nightly: :thunderbird: :vegan:<code>BtrFS</code> completely sucks & i shall never again make the error of using it instead of <code>ext4</code>. 😡<a href="https://infosec.space/tags/BtrFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BtrFS</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ext4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ext4</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#linux</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/filesystems" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#filesystems</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ArchInstall" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ArchInstall</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/ArchLinux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ArchLinux</a> <a href="https://infosec.space/tags/VM" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#VM</a>

Frühere Suchanfragen

Suchoptionen

Verwaltet von:

Serverstatistik:

#ext4