Nonilex<p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Harvard" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Harvard</span></a> also argued the <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/Trump" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Trump</span></a> admin had sped past ordinary procedures in its haste to punish Harvard. Lehotsky depicted the admin’s argument as an unbound approach to <a href="https://masto.ai/tags/ExecutivePower" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ExecutivePower</span></a>, one that would effectively allow presidents & their ofcls to do “whatever we want, whatever our priorities are,” without any meaningful guardrails.</p><p>Judge Burroughs seemed to share the worries of Lehotsky, who said the govt was pursuing an “anti-Harvard policy" that would be unlawful under any president.</p><p><a href="https://masto.ai/tags/law" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>law</span></a></p>