mastodontech.de ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
Offen für alle (über 16) und bereitgestellt von Markus'Blog

Serverstatistik:

1,4 Tsd.
aktive Profile

#instructionaldesign

0 Beiträge0 Beteiligte0 Beiträge heute

I was invited to do a Futures in Digital Learning Podcast with
Adam Davi and Brian Hale from the University of Arizona on #badging ecosystems.

We chatted about:
• The difference between badges and certificates
• What motivates learners to earn badges
• Designing meaning into a badging system

Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/1z9we
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/
YouTube Music: music.youtube.com/watch?v=oiOC
#InstructionalDesign #onlinelearning #digitallearning #edutoot

SpotifySeason 4 Episode 3 - BadgingFutures in Digital Learning · Episode

Hi I’m Annika! 28F and here’s my #introduction!
🐱 Cat mom.
🍜 Epicurean.
🚿 Showerhead balladeer.
🐀 The defiant lab rat in God’s pristine research facility.

🔍 I want to revive my interest in:
#art#books#typography#poetry#film

📚 My current interests are:
#psychology#selfdevelopment#spirituality#highstrangeness#pkm#heutagogy#systemsdesign#revops#frontendwebdev#devops

📜 I have a background in:
#graphicdesign#instructionaldesign#businessprocessanalysis#ecommerce#computerscience

Excited to be sharing this space with you!

🎓 Want to turn course content into visual, intuitive, and motivating learning paths in Moodle?

‼️Tue, June 17 at 14:00 (UTC), I’ll be presenting the (free) #MoodleAcademy webinar "Learning Maps in Moodle", where we’ll explore how the Learning Map plugin helps create clear, visual paths that guide learners through content in an engaging and flexible way.
Registration link: hubs.la/Q03qBKG00

I have recently fallen in love with the #roguelike and #roguelite genres of #videogames.

I’m especially interested in their powerful effects on #motivation, inspiring players to try-fail-try again-succeed, which is the holy grail for #instructionaldesign and #teaching more broadly.

I’d love to hear from #gamedevs and other #learningdesign pros who have explored integrating #rogueish mechanics in #learning, #seriousgames, and/or know of any #psychology #research connecting the two. Thanks!

Wie können wir gute Bildungsmaterialien mit KI gestalten?

Im Rahmen unserer 🔥#OERcamp Werkstatt zeigt @nele wie Offenheit & KI zusammenwirken: von OER über kreative Impulse bis zum Kartenaustausch.

KI hilft, Materialien vielfältiger, zugänglicher und kollaborativer zu machen.

💡 Offenheit als Motor für innovative Bildungspraxis!

👉 oercamp.de/material/so-gestalt

#OER #OERde #OEP #OpenEducation #InstructionalDesign #Lehrmaterialien #Didaktik #Bildunggestalten
#KI #Lernen

📢 Calling all distance learning leaders, online directors, and instructional design teams!
Join me on May 7 for a free webinar focused on creating an #OSCQR implementation plan to systematically review and refresh online courses and programs. 🌐
Leave with a template, tools & resources to scale your initiative.
🕛 12–1:30 PM ET
🔗 web.cvent.com/event/b54c0dfe-6
#OnlineTeaching #OnlineLearning #InstructionalDesign #HigherEd #Accessibility #RSI #HigherEducation

Join me for the next SUNY Online Teaching webinar where we'll dive deep into the world of Microsoft Copilot – an #AI -powered tool✨
🗓 Date: Wednesday, March 26
🕛 Time: Noon EST
🚀Free Registration: web.cvent.com/event/8c9b3787-6
Discover how Copilot can:
Transform your workflow.
Save you time.
Help you be more effective.
Session: overview & showcase of innovative use cases, so you can consider how an AI-powered assistant might enhance your daily life
#onlinelearning #edutoot #instructionaldesign

Venturing into the Unknown: Critical Insights into Grey Areas and Pioneering Future Directions in Educational Generative AI Research | TechTrends

The latest paper I can proudly add to my list of publications,  Venturing into the Unknown: Critical Insights into Grey Areas and Pioneering Future Directions in Educational Generative AI Research has been published in the (unfortunately) closed journal TechTrends. Here’s a direct link to the paper that should hopefully bypass the paywall, if it has not been used too often.

I’m 16th of 47 coauthors, led by the truly wonderful Junhong Xiao, who is the primary orchestrator and mastermind behind it. This is a companion piece to our Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI and it starts where the other paper left off, delving further into what we don’t know (or at least do not agree that we know) about and (taking up most of the paper) what we might do about that lack of knowledge. I think this presents a pretty useful and wide-ranging research agenda for anyone with an interest in AI and education.

Methodologically, it emerged through a collaborative writing process between a very multinational group of international researchers in open, digital, and online learning. It’s not a random sample of people who happen to know one another: the huge group represents a rich mix of (extremely) well-established and (excellent) emerging researchers from a broad set of cultural backgrounds, covering a wide range of research interests in the field. Junhong does a great job of extracting the themes and organizing all of that into a coherent narrative.

In many ways I like this paper more than its companion piece. I think this is because, though its findings are – as the title implies – less well-defined than the first, I am more closely aligned with the underlying assumptions, attitudes and values that underpin the analysis. It grapples more firmly with the wicked problems and it goes deeper into the broader, situated, human nature of the systems in which generative AI is necessarily intertwingled, skimming over the more simplistic conversations about cheating, reliability, and so on to get at some meatier but more fundamental issues that, ultimately, relate to how and why we do this education thing in the first place.

Abstract

Advocates of AI in Education (AIEd) assert that the current generation of technologies, collectively dubbed artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), promise results that can transform our conceptions of what education looks like. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate how educators perceive GenAI and its potential use and future impact on education. Adopting the methodology of collective writing as an inquiry, this study reports on the participating educators’ perceived grey areas (i.e. issues that are unclear and/or controversial) and recommendations on future research. The grey areas reported cover decision-making on the use of GenAI, AI ethics, appropriate levels of use of GenAI in education, impact on learning and teaching, policy, data, GenAI outputs, humans in the loop and public–private partnerships. Recommended directions for future research include learning and teaching, ethical and legal implications, ownership/authorship, funding, technology, research support, AI metaphor and types of research. Each theme or subtheme is presented in the form of a statement, followed by a justification. These findings serve as a call to action to encourage a continuing debate around GenAI and to engage more educators in research. The paper concludes that unless we can ask the right questions now, we may find that, in the pursuit of greater efficiency, we have lost the very essence of what it means to educate and learn.

Reference

Xiao, J., Bozkurt, A., Nichols, M., Pazurek, A., Stracke, C. M., Bai, J. Y. H., Farrow, R., Mulligan, D., Nerantzi, C., Sharma, R. C., Singh, L., Frumin, I., Swindell, A., Honeychurch, S., Bond, M., Dron, J., Moore, S., Leng, J., van Tryon, P. J. S., … Themeli, C. (2025). Venturing into the Unknown: Critical Insights into Grey Areas and Pioneering Future Directions in Educational Generative AI Research. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01060-6
SpringerLinkVenturing into the Unknown: Critical Insights into Grey Areas and Pioneering Future Directions in Educational Generative AI Research - TechTrendsAdvocates of AI in Education (AIEd) assert that the current generation of technologies, collectively dubbed artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), promise results that can transform our conceptions of what education looks like. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate how educators perceive GenAI and its potential use and future impact on education. Adopting the methodology of collective writing as an inquiry, this study reports on the participating educators’ perceived grey areas (i.e. issues that are unclear and/or controversial) and recommendations on future research. The grey areas reported cover decision-making on the use of GenAI, AI ethics, appropriate levels of use of GenAI in education, impact on learning and teaching, policy, data, GenAI outputs, humans in the loop and public–private partnerships. Recommended directions for future research include learning and teaching, ethical and legal implications, ownership/authorship, funding, technology, research support, AI metaphor and types of research. Each theme or subtheme is presented in the form of a statement, followed by a justification. These findings serve as a call to action to encourage a continuing debate around GenAI and to engage more educators in research. The paper concludes that unless we can ask the right questions now, we may find that, in the pursuit of greater efficiency, we have lost the very essence of what it means to educate and learn.